Agenda and minutes

Appeals and Reviews Committee - Monday, 19th April, 2021 5.00 pm

Venue: Virtual Meeting - Zoom. View directions

Note: This is a public meeting and can be viewed by clicking on the media link below (you may need to use Chrome as a browser to do so).

Media

Items
No.	Item
17.	Minutes of the Previous Meeting PDF 194 KB To receive and note the minutes of the previous meeting. Minutes: The minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 17th November 2020 were received and noted.
18.	Questions Under Other Committee Procedures 12.8 Minutes: No questions had been submitted.
19.	Disclosures of Pecuniary and Personal Interests Minutes: No disclosures were made.
20.	Borough of Charnwood (129 Rothley Road, Mountsorrel) Tree Preservation Order 2020 PDF 81 KB A report of the Head of Strategic Support is attached. Additional documents: ANNEX 1 to Item 05 ORDER 129 Rothley Road Mountsorrel , item 20. PDF 1 MB ANNEX 2 to Item 05 OBJECT PART 1 129 Rothley Road Mountsorrel , item 20. PDF 17 MB ANNEX 2 to Item 05 OBJECT PART 2 129 Rothley Road Mountsorrel , item 20. PDF 5 MB ANNEX 2 to Item 05 OBJECT PART 3 129 Rothley Road Mountsorrel , item 20. PDF 7 MB ANNEX 3 to Item 05 HPR RESPONSE 129 Rothley Road Mountsorrel , item 20. PDF 719 KB Minutes: Considered a report of the Head of Strategic Support setting out details of the Tree Preservation Order served on the above site, the objection received to the Order and the comments of the Head of Planning and Regeneration on the issues raised by the objection (item 5 on the agenda filed with these minutes). Assisting with consideration of the report: the Locum Solicitor. The Head of Planning and Regeneration’s representatives and the objector and her representative attended the meeting to put forward their cases and answer the Committee’s questions. The Committee considered this matter in accordance with the “Procedure for Considering Objections to Tree Preservation Orders” set out in the Council’s Constitution and on the agenda for this meeting. RESOLVED that the Borough of Charnwood (129 Rothley Road, Mountsorrel) Tree Preservation Order 2020 be confirmed with modification to remove trees T2, T3 and T5 from the order. Reason Having considered, in accordance with the procedure set out in the Council’s Constitution, the objection to the Order, the Committee considers that the reasons put forward for not protecting the trees T2, T3 and T5 outweigh the contribution they make to the amenity of the area and that trees T2, T3 and T5 should not therefore be protected.
21.	Borough of Charnwood (The Bradgate, 37 Main Street, Newtown Linford) Tree Preservation Order 2020 PDF 84 KB A report of the Head of Strategic Support is attached. Additional documents: ANNEX 1 to Item 06 ORDER The Bradgate 37 Main Street Newtown Linford , item 21. PDF 1 MB ANNEX 2 to Item 06 OBJECTION The Bradgate 37 Main Street Newtown Linford , item 21. PDF 61 KB ANNEX 3 to Item 06 HPR RESPONSE The Bradgate 37 Main Street Newtown Linford , item 21. PDF 799 KB Additional Info from Mr Young Objector TPO 2020 The Bradgate 37 Main Street Newtown Linford , item 21. PDF 432 KB Minutes: Considered a report of the Head of Strategic Support setting out details of the Tree Preservation Order served on the above site, the objections received to the Order and the comments of the Head of Planning and Regeneration on the issues raised by the objections (item 6 on the agenda and agenda supplement filed with these minutes). Assisting with consideration of the report: the Locum Solicitor. The Head of Planning and Regeneration’s representatives and both objectors attended the meeting to put forward their cases and answer the Committee’s questions. The Committee considered this matter in accordance with the “Procedure for Considering Objections to Tree Preservation Orders” set out in the Council’s Constitution and on the agenda for this meeting. RESOLVED that the Borough of Charnwood (The Bradgate, 37 Main Street, Newtown Linford) Tree Preservation Order 2020 be confirmed without modification. Reason Having considered, in accordance with the procedure set out in the Council’s Constitution, the objections to the Order, the Committee considered that the reasons put forward for not protecting the trees did not outweigh the contribution they made to the amenity of the area and that the trees should therefore be protected. Notwithstanding the above, the Committee noted that the protection afforded by the Order did not prevent the future and appropriate management of the trees via an application for works to trees subject to a tree preservation order.